Legal Opinion

Williams v. Foster

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 13, 1933No. 5564PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HITZ, Associate Justice.

This is an appeal by defendant below from a decree in equity adjudging him hable for portions of certain attorneys’ fees collected by him from eases in which he and Robert M. Foster, both lawyers, had engaged by agreement between them.

As Dolores Foster is a party only by assignment of her husband’s interest, we will refer to Mr. Foster as plaintiff and to Mr. Williams as defendant.

The defendant had been practicing law in the District of Columbia for some years, and, desiring a junior associate, took the plaintiff into employment or partnership for one year beginning…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Neale v. NealesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Spalding v. MasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Consaul v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Washington Railway & Electric Co. v. ScalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Crescent Mining Co. v. Wasatch Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lehigh Valley R. Co. of New Jersey v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
  2. Hotel Lafayette, Inc. v. PickfordCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API