Legal Opinion
Acceptance Insurance v. Walkingstick Ex Rel. Walkingstick
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided May 24, 1995No. Civ. A. H-94-3683PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Final Judgment
HUGHES, District Judge.
1. This court adopts the memorandum and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge signed April 25, 1995.
2. Acceptance Insurance Company has no duty to defend, indemnify, or provide insurance coverage to Melanni Walkingstick, Individually and as Next Friend of Gabriel Walkingstick, Maria Espinosa, Daniel Espinosa, and Weyel L. Foster and Nguyen Phung Kim, Individually and doing business as Harrisburg Country Club.
MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
MARCIA A. CRONE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the court is Plaintiff Acceptance Insurance…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
- Topalian v. EhrmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Forbau Ex Rel. Miller v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- First Financial Insurance v. BuggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- American Western Home Insurance v. IsraelDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- Century Surety Co. v. Glen Willows, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
- Monticello Insurance v. Patriot Security, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1996
- Acceptance Insurance v. Jedjo, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.