Central Foundry Co. v. Benderson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion
On the Merits
A decree pro confesso admits the facts alleged in the bill. It does not admit that the facts alleged authorize equitable relief. It does not admit that the facts give the court jurisdiction of the subject matter and does not consent for the relief to be granted. In other words, when the bill does not contain sufficient averments to give it equity and to authorize the relief prayed, even though no defense is made and the averments of the bill are taken as confessed, the trial court should not grant relief to the complainant. Collier v. Collier, 274 Ala. 131, 145 So.2d 821. See…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- George H. Jett v. Albert Barnes Zink, Howard M. Pack v. Albert Barnes Zink Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Orkin Exterminating Co. of North Ala. v. KrawcheckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Rinehart v. Reliance Life Insurance Co. of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Alabama Power Co. v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Collier v. CollierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.