Legal Opinion

Rhodabarger v. Childs

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 6, 1926No. 16328PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, C.

Parties appear in the same order as in the trial court. Plaintiff alleged that he and defendant W. O. Childs were partners, by oral agreement, in the drilling of certain oil and gas wells; that the latter owned three strings of drilling tools, exhibiting the inventory thereof; that Childs sold and agreed to deliver to plaintiff an undivided one-half interest therein for $8,000, to be paid out of the profits of the drilling; that plaintiff was to conduct "the drilling and receive also $150 per month for living expenses; that, accordingly, plaintiff drilled ten wells, for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cressler v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  3. Comanche Ice Fuel Co. v. Binder HillerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Haltom v. Nichols & Shepard Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Public Finance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Bates v. Old Mac Coal Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. MARTIN v. PHILLIPSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  4. Swift & Co. v. WaldenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Tucker v. ZacharySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API