Legal Opinion

Border Brokerage Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 26, 1957No. 60936; protests 282319-K, 295378-K, and 279719-K (Seattle)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

These cases, consolidated at the trial, involve a number of claims, including a claim that the liquidation is invalid and void and should be set aside so that the collector can give notice of appraisement, as required by section 501 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.

At the trial, counsel submitted these cases on the following stipulation:

Me. Tuttle: Each of these protests contained claims as to rates of duty but also as originally filed or by virtue of an amendment granted yesterday, each has this claim: the liquidation is invalid and void and should be set aside so that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. John P. Herber & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  2. United States v. Tampa Box Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Pitman Publishing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API