Legal Opinion

Stone v. Neeley

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1894No. 4427PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from the district court of Buffalo county. Tried below before Hamer, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Ryan, C.

In the petition filed in the district court of Buffalo county this cause was entitled “ Rebecca S. Neeley, plaintiff, v. H. L. Strong and George W. Stone, defendants.” Nowhere in the petition were the defendants described otherwise than above, except in the written contract, which formed the basis of plaintiff’s alleged cause of action. This contract was in the following language :

“Kearney, Nebraska, April 25, 1884.
“To whom it may concern: I hereby authorize Strong <& Stone to sell lots 499 and 500, in the city of Kearney, for the sum of ($3,000) three thousand dollars, deducting…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cropsey v. WiggenhornNebraska Supreme Court · 1873
  2. First National Bank v. SlomanNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. White v. MerriamNebraska Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PielstickerNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  2. McDonnell v. WasenmillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  3. Tremblay v. FoulkesOregon Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API