Legal Opinion

Tremblay v. Foulkes

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1939Published

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

There are but five questions involved in this appeal.(1) Does the absence of an allegation in the complaint, that defendants were copartners prevent proof of defendant Eberly’s liability for the price of the logs in suit?(2) Should the trial court have instructed the jury that defendant Eberly could not be held liable upon the ground that he and his codefendant were partners; and that as a matter of law the evidence herein shows that no partnership existed between defendants?(3) Was reversible error committed in overruling' défendants’ objection to tbe following question propounded to Mr.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Steele v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1915
  2. Evans v. MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Clark v. WickOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Biondi v. Central Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  5. Lentz v. Oregon Growers Co-Operative Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API