Hogg v. City of Rome
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Justice.
In so far as the petition complains of a violation of section 6 of the housing co-operation law (Ga. L. 1937, p. 697), by failure to make estimate and appropriate money, it should be noted that this law expressly provides that any such appropriation shall be made out of any moneys in the city treasury not appropriated to some other purpose. We think a proper construction of this law means that it imposes no obligation upon the city to pay such operating expenses if there is not in the treasury of such city money not appropriated to other purposes. In the petition it’ is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Young v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
- Finleyson Bros. v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Pittard v. SummerourSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Americus Grocery Co. v. Pitts Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Bass v. Mayor of ColumbusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
3Cited by20 opinions
- Stegall v. Southwest Ga. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Stegall v. Southwest Georgia Regional Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Humphrey v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1940
- Koehler v. MassellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
- Spence v. RowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.