Legal Opinion

Dozier v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 3, 1988No. 75973PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction of driving under the influence of alcohol, OCGA § 40-6-391.

1. Defendant contends that the results of an intoximeter test were inadmissible because he was denied his right under OCGA § 40-6-392 (a) (3) to have an independent urine test. He enumerates as error the denial of his motion in limine, and his motions to dismiss made at the close of the State’s evidence and of all the evidence.

Puett v. State, 147 Ga. App. 300 (248 SE2d 560) (1978), in which the officers failed to take accused to a hospital where he had arranged for a test, held: “The law…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Puett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Munda v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  3. State v. DullCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Harper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hattaway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. Melvin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API