Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Stark

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 21, 1990No. 72 W.D. Appeal Docket 1989PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LARSEN, Justice.

In this appeal we are presented with the issue of whether a trial court may, during sentencing, change a previously rendered verdict of guilty to one of not guilty.

Appellant, Lawrence Stark, was charged with the crimes of terroristic threats and simple assault. 1 At the close of the evidence at appellant’s bench trial, the following exchange took place:

THE COURT: All right. Bring the defendant forward. THE DEFENDANT: Sir, can I say something?

THE COURT: I think you better talk through your counsel. That’s the way I operate in this courtroom.

THE DEFENDANT: I was trying…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. ParkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. SchomakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Commonwealth v. SchomakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. RosarioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. ViglioneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Commonwealth v. NockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API