Commonwealth v. Stark
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LARSEN, Justice.
In this appeal we are presented with the issue of whether a trial court may, during sentencing, change a previously rendered verdict of guilty to one of not guilty.
Appellant, Lawrence Stark, was charged with the crimes of terroristic threats and simple assault. 1 At the close of the evidence at appellant’s bench trial, the following exchange took place:
THE COURT: All right. Bring the defendant forward. THE DEFENDANT: Sir, can I say something?
THE COURT: I think you better talk through your counsel. That’s the way I operate in this courtroom.
THE DEFENDANT: I was trying…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. ParkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. SchomakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. SchomakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
3Cited by22 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. RosarioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. ViglioneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. NockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.