Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Schomaker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 1983No. 51 W.D. Appeal Docket, 1982PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

This appeal is before the Court upon a grant of appellant’s allocatur petition. 1 Appellant challenges the Court of Com mon Pleas’ grant and the Superior Court’s, 239 Pa. Super. 78, 437 A.2d 999, affirmance of a new trial following their finding that a fatal variance existed between the indictment and the jury instructions at appellant’s trial. The appellant was charged with criminal conspiracy and theft by deception. He now argues that his motion for arrest of judgment should have been granted. We agree.

Facts germane to the resolution of this case are summarized as…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Commonwealth v. HudeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Commonwealth v. HornerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. SchomakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. WojdakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. WayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. SwerdlowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API