Legal Opinion
Arthur W. Bowley v. Stotler & Co. And John Mulach C/o Stotler & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 8, 1985No. 84-1104Published
1Opinion of the Court
751 F.2d 641
40 Fed.R.Serv.2d 1342
Arthur W. BOWLEY, Appellant,
v.
STOTLER & CO. and John Mulach c/o Stotler & Co., Appellees.
No. 84-1104.
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
Argued Sept. 10, 1984.
Decided Jan. 8, 1985.
Kenneth E. Aaron (Argued), A. Ronald Taxin, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.
Thomas F. Kolter (Argued), Chicago, Ill., Patricia L. Freeland, Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellees.
Kenneth M. Raisler, Gen. Counsel, Pat G. Nicolette, Whitney Adams, Deputy Gen. Counsels, H. Lowell Brown, Atty., Commodity Futures Trading Com'n, Washington, D.C., for amicus…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CurranSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Namet v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bertha Hecht, and v. Harris, Upham & Co., a Partnership, Harris, Upham & Co., Inc., a Corporation, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Helen C. Carras and Bill G. Carras, Co-Executors of the Estate of Gus N. Carras, Deceased v. James S. Burns, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
- Hecht v. Harris, Upham & Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1968
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.