Legal Opinion · Dissent

Regan v. Conservation Commission

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 26, 2010No. 09-P-391Published

1DissentGraham, J.

Had the plaintiffs not sought further review from the town’s conservation commission (commission), the Department of Environmental Protection’s (DEP) superseding order of conditions clearly would apply. The plaintiffs, however, chose not to pursue their right to enforce the DEP’s superseding order. In voluntarily returning to the commission and continuing before it even after notice of the DEP’s superseding order, the plaintiffs chose to ignore the tardiness of the commission’s first decision and their right to enforce the DEP’s superseding order. They opted, instead, to reinvoke the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lovequist v. Conservation Commission of DennisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. FIC Homes of Blackstone, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  3. Oyster Creek Preservation, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  4. Dubuque v. Conservation CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  5. Murphy v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API