(PS) Montano v. Small Business Administration
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FERNAN MONTANO, No. 2:22-cv-1753 TLN DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Fernan Montano is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to 18 the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending 19 before the Court are plaintiff’s complaint, motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 20 U.S.C. § 1915, and motion for a temporary restraining order. (ECF Nos. 1-3.) The complaint 21…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.