Legal Opinion
Miller v. Bare
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 12, 1978No. Civ. A. 77-228PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SNYDER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, residents of Hampton Township, Pennsylvania, brought this action against the Defendants, who are residents of Canfield, Ohio, for compensatory and punitive damages for injury resulting from misrepresentation by Defendants of the boundaries and condition of property they sold to Plaintiffs. Jurisdiction is founded on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
FINDINGS OF FACT
On December 29, 1972, E. Edward Bare and Margaret S. Bare, his wife, became the owners of two contiguous tracts of land in Hampton Township, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Gilbert v. Korvette's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Bardwell v. the Willis CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Rempel v. Nationwide Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Associated Hardware Supply Co. v. The Big Wheel Distributing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- 26 Collier bankr.cas.2d 663, Bankr. L. Rep. P 74,447 in Re Allegheny International, Inc. J. Daniel SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Diversified Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- In re Allegheny International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Mancini v. MorrowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Contractor Utility Sales Co. v. Certain-teed Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.