Legal Opinion

Belle v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 22, 2018No. 14–16–00304–CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJORITY OPINION

John Donovan, Justice *874Appellant Michael Belle brings this appeal, pro se, from his conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon.1 Appellant pled true to two enhancement allegations and the jury sentenced him to twenty-eight years in prison. We affirm.

Appellant's brief raises a number of issues.2 We have addressed each issue that we have identified as being fairly included and have used appellant's nomenclature of the issues. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(f).

SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE

In Part B of appellant's second issue he complains of the actions of the district…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Isassi v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  5. McDuff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Donna Lynn Martin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
  2. Daniel Moreno Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2019
  3. Donna Lynn Martin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
  4. Enrique Guadalupe Ortega, Jr. v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2023
  5. Jose Venancio v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2022

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API