Legal Opinion

Lewis Cox & Son, Inc. v. High Plains Underground Water Conservation District No. 1

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 21, 1976No. 8687PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Justice.

The question presented is whether the enforcement of an underground water conservation district’s order to close or re-equip an irrigation well so as not to be in violation of regulations is subject to the defenses of limitation, laches and estoppel. We hold that the enforcement of the order is immune from the defenses and affirm the trial court’s summary judgment, the right to which was resisted only by the imposition of these defenses.

Article 16, section 59, of the Texas Constitution authorizes the legislature to create conservation and reclamation districts, which “shall…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brazos River Authority v. City of GrahamTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Harris County Flood Control District v. MannTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Bexar County v. LindenTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Bennett v. Brown County Water Improvement District No. OneTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Delta County v. BlackburnTexas Supreme Court · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Monsanto Co. v. Cornerstones Municipal Utility DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Truong v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  3. State v. DurhamTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Capitol Rod & Gun Club v. Lower Colorado River AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. David Stratta v. Billy HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API