Legal Opinion
Dixon v. Tyree
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided April 11, 1914No. 18,781PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 1; Thomas C. Wilson, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Burch, J.:
In September, 1911, Tyree purchased an automobile from Moomaw and gave a chattel mortgage to secure a portion of the purchase price. The mortgage was withheld from record until April 2, 1912. On March 2, 1912, Dixon loaned Tyree a sum of money and took as security a chattel mortgage on the automobile. Dixon had no knowledge of the Moomaw mortgage and. withheld his own mortgage from record. During all this time the automobile remained in Tyree’s possession. Tyree left the state, and on April 2 Moo-maw found the automobile in a.barn owned by L.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cameron, Hull & Co. v. MarvinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Garrison v. Street & Harper Furniture & Carpet Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Sheets v. PoffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Abernathy v. MaddenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hayes v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
- Gafford Lumber & Grain Co. v. EavesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- In Re Bell Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Wyatt v. DuncanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Craig v. Industrial Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.