Legal Opinion
City of Littleton v. Wagenblast
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided May 11, 1959No. 18308PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Doyle
The City of Littleton seeks reversal of a judgment of the County Court of Arapahoe County granting the petition of defendant in error which sought disconnection of his land following annexation by the City of Little-ton. For clarity and convenience we shall refer to the plaintiff in error as the city and to defendant in error as petitioner or as Wagenblast. The references to Colorado Revised Statutes of 1953 will be by chapter, article and section number only.
The action was commenced in the County Court of Arapahoe County by the filing of a petition by Wagenblast pursuant to 139-11-6. In…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Burlington v. LeebrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Ruland v. City of AugustaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- In Re City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Klise v. Town of RiverdaleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
- Reichelt v. Town of JulesburgSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Greenwood Village v. for the Proposed City of CentennialSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- City of Englewood v. DailySupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
- Allely v. City of EvansColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
- Colorado Land Use Commission v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- Gavend v. City of ThorntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.