Legal Opinion
Mahoning Ore & Steel Co. v. Blomfelt
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 5, 1908No. 2,830PublishedCited by 3 opinions
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota.
1Opinion of the Court
W. H. MUNGER, District Judge.
This action was brought by William Blomfelt, as administrator of the estate of Oscar Blomfelt, to recover damages for the wrongful death of said Oscar Blomfelt. The complaint alleges that deceased was about 21 years of age; that he left surviving him as only heir and next of kin his father, about 5(5 years of age; that the father was dependent upon deceased for maintenance and support; that the deceased was in the employ of the defendant, a mining corporation; that defendant in the operation of its mines operated a railroad, with various tracks, engines, and other…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Richmond & Danville Railroad v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Renlund v. Commodore Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Kline v. Minnesota Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Patek v. American Smelting & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Kibbe v. Stevenson Iron Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vandell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Saveljich v. Lytle Logging & Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
- Bishop v. WightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915