Legal Opinion
Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Roven
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided March 7, 1980No. 12605PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SOSA, Chief Justice.
Defendants appeal from an order of the district court refusing to set aside a default judgment for a debt upon a commodity account.
The first issue is whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying the defendant’s Rule 55(c) motion to vacate in accordance with Rule 60(b)(1) on the grounds of mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect. N.M.R.Civ.P. 55(c), N.M.S.A.1978 (Spec.Supp.1979); N.M.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1), N.M.S.A.1978. The second issue is whether the district court abused its discretion by refusing to compel arbitration between the parties. We…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hanes Corporation, a North Carolina Corporation v. Julien MillardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Cora Hubbard Williams v. Cora Williams Murdoch and Commonwealth Bank and Trust Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Springer Corporation v. HerreraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- Episcopal Housing Corp. v. Federal InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Burke County Public Schools Board of Education v. Shaver PartnershipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Hecla Mining Co. v. Bunker Hill Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Rodriguez v. ConantNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
- GAF Corp. v. WernerNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Daniels Insurance Agency, Inc. v. JordanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.