Legal Opinion

M & B Drilling & Construction Co. v. State Board of Equalization

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1985No. 84-36, 84-37PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROONEY, *** Justice.

M & B Drilling and Construction Company, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “M & B”) petitioned the district court to review an administrative action by the State Board of Equalization and by the three individual members of such Board (hereinafter referred to as “Board”); and additionally M & B filed an action for declaratory judgment

“primarily because the State was not providing a credit to M & B Drilling for the sales tax erroneously paid against its use tax assessment. As previously argued, this failure constitutes a violation of W.S. § 39-6-409(a)[ 1 ] and Article I, §…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Rocky Mountain Oil and Gas Ass'n v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  3. SCHOOL DISTRICTS NOS. 2, 3, 6, 9, AND 10 v. CookWyoming Supreme Court · 1967
  4. City of Cheyenne v. SimsWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Bryarly v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Resources Co. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State Board of Equalization v. Jackson Hole Ski Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Hirschfield v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Simon v. Teton Board of RealtorsWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Union Pacific Resources Co. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API