Legal Opinion

Safety Insurance v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 13, 2003No. 01-P-691PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKantrowitz, J.

“Navigating the tortuous twists of automobile insurance law poses a challenge at least equal to that faced by the uninitiated driver on his first foray into the streets of *100Boston.” Cardin v. Royal Ins. Co. of America, 394 Mass. 450, 452 (1985). Taking yet another journey down that twisted road, we examine whether an insurer, Safety Insurance Company (Safety), having paid personal injury protection (PIP) benefits, has the right of subrogation against the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA). The motion judge concluded that the right of subrogation exists. In the absence of a clear…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pinnick v. ClearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  2. Cardin v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Frost v. Porter Leasing Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Chipman v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  5. Vieira v. SchuppMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lima v. MarshallMassachusetts Superior Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API