Legal Opinion · Dissent

Matsyuk v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 2012No. Nos. 84686-3; 85012-7Published

1DissentMadsen, C.J.

¶39 (dissenting) — Under the “common fund” equitable basis for an award of attorney fees, attorney fees may be awarded when a litigant preserves or creates a common fund for the benefit of the litigant and others. See Mahler v. Szucs, 135 Wn.2d 398, 426-27, 957 P.2d 632 (1998) (citing Coveil v. City of Seattle, 127 Wn.2d 874, 891, 905 P.2d 324 (1995)). The common fund theory has been applied to require a PIP (personal injury protection) insurer to pay pro rata legal costs incurred by an injured insured to obtain a recovery from the responsible tortfeasor or the tortfeasor’s insurer. The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. PettusSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API