Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Miller

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1922No. 16970PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Mills, J., entered July 16, 1921, in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for rescission, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

— On April 21, 1919, Allen 0. Miller and wife entered into a written contract with May Farrell by which they agreed to sell to her lots 10 and 11, block B, of E. F. Beck’s Replat of block 72 of Burke’s Second addition to the city of Seattle. A cash payment was made and the balance of the purchase price was to be paid in monthly installments. Upon full payment the vendors were to give a good and sufficient warranty deed to the purchaser. The contract contained no provision against the right of assignment. May Farrell and her husband took possession of the premises, and after making payments in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Hillsboro Garden TractsOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Webb v. StephensonWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Morris v. Columbia Canal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. French v. C. D. & E. Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thompson v. HustonWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Townsend v. RosenbaumWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Main v. Western Loan & Building Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Gillmore v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Sevigny v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API