Legal Opinion

Garmany v. Southern Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 18, 1929No. 12731PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Carter.

These suits by J. R. Garmany, as plaintiff, against the Southern Railway Company, and P. E. Terry, as plaintiff, against the same defendant, were commenced in the Court of Common Pleas for Jasper County, September 25, 1926, for the recovery of damages to lands and crops of the plaintiffs in said county of Jasper, at or near the town of Hardeeville, on account of alleged diversion and obstruction of surface water by the defendant. The defendant set up a general denial. By agreement the cases were tried together, at the December, 1926,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brandenberg v. ZeiglerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  2. Deason v. Southern Railway CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  3. Cain v. South Bound R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  4. Touchberry v. Northwestern R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  5. Rivenbark v. A. C. L. R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Irwin v. Michelin Tire Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Fairey v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  3. M AND M CORP. v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. M AND M CORP. v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API