Legal Opinion

Rivenbark v. A. C. L. R. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 10, 1923No. 11178PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

April 10, 1923. The opinion of the Court was delivered by Action for damages in a Magistrate's Court, based upon the following complaint:

"(1) That the plaintiff is a resident of the Town of Hardeeville, in said county and the defendant is a railway corporation having a line of railway passing through, and an office and agent in, the said county and State.
"(2) That plaintiff lives in the town of Hardeeville, on the line of the defendant's railroad, and is, and was at the time of the acts herein complained of, in possession of a garden, which he planted with vegetables in the spring of the year…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Faust v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
  2. Jones v. HannovanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  3. Baltzeger v. Car. Midland Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
  4. Brandenberg v. ZeiglerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  5. Lawton v. South Bound R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Deason v. Southern Railway CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  2. Garmany v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  3. Fairey v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  4. Banks v. So. Ry., Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  5. Deason v. Southern Railway CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API