Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Johnson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1936No. Docket No. 39, Calendar No. 38,696PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Plaintiff: Clara S. Carlson is the daughter of defendant.

Plaintiffs had judgment upon the following instrument :

“Whereas, Frederick G. Carlson and Clara S. Carlson have, at the request and for the benefit of Frederick L. Johnson incumbered or mortgaged their lot, known as,the northerly half of lot seven (7) in block seven (7) in George L. Wrenn’s Addition to Highland Park, Lake county, Illinois, for the sum of $1,500 bearing interest at the rate of 6% per cent, per annum, payable semi-annually, and
“Whereas, they have turned over the proceeds of said loan, less the expense for procuring the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crooker v. HolmesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1875
  2. Page v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  3. Smithers v. JunkerU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1889
  4. Nelson v. Von BonnhorstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857
  5. Benton v. BentonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. F. H. McClintock Co. v. Truxell Sales & Service, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Purlo Corp. v. 3925 Woodward Avenue, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Soloman v. Western Hills Development Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. American University v. ToddSuperior Court of Delaware · 1938
  5. Earl Dubey & Sons, Inc. v. MacOmb Concrete Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API