Legal Opinion

Construction Pace Setters, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 8, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint on Statute of Limitations grounds (see, CPLR 3211 [a] [5]). Even assuming, arguendo, that the limitations period of State Finance Law § 137 applies, plaintiff, a subcontractor, failed timely to commence this action against defendant, which issued a labor and materials bond under that section. An action on a bond issued under that section must be commenced within "one year from the date on which final payment under the claimant’s subcontract became due” (State Finance Law § 137 [4] [b]). The pay when paid provision of the subcontract…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schuler-Haas Electric Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Schuler-Haas Electric Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. Cortland Paving Co. v. Capitol District Contractors, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. William H. Lane, Inc. v. American Druggists' InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Masters Edge, Inc. v. Kemper Insurance Companies/Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Windsor Metal Fabrications, Ltd. v. General Accident Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API