Legal Opinion · Dissent

Klindworth v. O'CONNOR

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 4, 1951No. 14310Published

1DissentBond, Chief Justice

It will be observed that the judgment of the trial court as to Ted C. O’Connor, a non compos mentis, is not based on contract, but founded in tort. Ted C. O’Con-nor was an incompetent, unable to enter into any contract with the defendants in reference to real estate transactions. The appellants-defendants knew of his incompetence; — hence any contract with him is void ab initio.

“Generally speaking, a person of unsound mind is precluded from enjoying any rights or performing any duties which involve the exercise of reason. * * 24 Tex.Jur., p. 379, sec. 6. Ted C. O’Connor’s cause of action,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Briggs v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  2. Cotton v. CooperTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  3. Cotton v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Walcott v. HendrickTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Stephens County v. H. C. Burt & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API