Klindworth v. O'CONNOR
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentBond, Chief Justice
It will be observed that the judgment of the trial court as to Ted C. O’Connor, a non compos mentis, is not based on contract, but founded in tort. Ted C. O’Con-nor was an incompetent, unable to enter into any contract with the defendants in reference to real estate transactions. The appellants-defendants knew of his incompetence; — hence any contract with him is void ab initio.
“Generally speaking, a person of unsound mind is precluded from enjoying any rights or performing any duties which involve the exercise of reason. * * 24 Tex.Jur., p. 379, sec. 6. Ted C. O’Connor’s cause of action,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Briggs v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Cotton v. CooperTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- Cotton v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Walcott v. HendrickTexas Supreme Court · 1851
- Stephens County v. H. C. Burt & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.