Legal Opinion

Sandoval v. M.J.F. Bowery Corp.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided July 22, 2011No. ESCV200901835CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Kirpalani, Maynard, J.

INTRODUCTION

The plaintiffs, Katherine Sandoval (“Sandoval”), Noel Van Wagner (“Van Wagner”), Bonnie Griffin (“Griffin”), and Amy Bloodgood (“Bloodgood”) (collectively the “Plaintiffs”) worked for the defendant, M.J.F. Bowery Corporation d/b/a Ten’s Show Club (the “Club”), an adult entertainment facility located in Salisbuiy, Massachusetts, as exotic dancers. This matter is currently before the court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, requesting the court determine, as a matter of law, that they are employees under G.L.c. 149, §148B. For the reasons…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Attorney General v. BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Correllas v. ViveirosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. Ng Bros. Construction, Inc. v. CranneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Monteiro v. PJD Entertainment of Worcester, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API