Pilley v. Smith
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
On the hearing the question in difference was made to turn on the construction of a deed of gift from W. H. Pilley and wife to their five children, including the plaintiff herein, William Bryan Pilley.
The deed is dated 15 December, 1910, and was duly registered 17 January, 1911. The words used (1) in the granting clause, “to said parties of the second part, their heirs and assigns,” (2) in the habendum “to the said parties of the second part, their heirs and assigns, their only use and behoof forever,” and (3) in the warranty, “covenant with said parties of the second part, their heirs and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Triplett v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Bryant v. . ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Artis v. . ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Bryant v. ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Whitley v. ArensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Oxendine v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Whetsell v. JerniganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Lackey v. Hamlet City Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Edwards v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.