Seeman Bros. v. Osaka Shosen Kaisha
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
Seeman Bros., as partners, have assigned their alleged claim of fraud to the present plaintiff in error. The -partnership entered into a contract in April, 1920, for the purchase of 200 tons of Java white sugar at 17% cents, to be shipped during August, 1920. This contract of purchase provided that “bill of lading to be considered proof of date of shipment.” A letter of credit was established at a New York bank for the amount of the purchase price, and it provided for “invoice, custom house release, negotiable dock- delivery order.” The theory of the action is that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thomas v. TaggartSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Harper v. HochstimCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Allen v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1919
3Cited by2 opinions
- Adams v. RobertsDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2021
- Avery v. TEKsystems, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024