Legal Opinion

Seeman Bros. v. Osaka Shosen Kaisha

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 6, 1926No. 104PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

Seeman Bros., as partners, have assigned their alleged claim of fraud to the present plaintiff in error. The -partnership entered into a contract in April, 1920, for the purchase of 200 tons of Java white sugar at 17% cents, to be shipped during August, 1920. This contract of purchase provided that “bill of lading to be considered proof of date of shipment.” A letter of credit was established at a New York bank for the amount of the purchase price, and it provided for “invoice, custom house release, negotiable dock- delivery order.” The theory of the action is that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. TaggartSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Harper v. HochstimCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  3. Allen v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adams v. RobertsDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2021
  2. Avery v. TEKsystems, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API