Legal Opinion
Peffley v. Durakool, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided September 24, 1987No. S86-39PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MILLER, District Judge.
This cause comes before the court on the motion for summary judgment of defendant Durakool, Inc. Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. For the reasons that follow, the court finds that the defendant’s summary judgment motion should be granted, and that the defendant’s motion for sanctions under Rule 11, Fed.R.Civ.P., should be denied.
I. Facts
Durakool employed the plaintiff, Patty L. Peffley, from 1972 until her termination on January 27, 1984. At the time of her termination, Mrs. Peffley earned approximately $5.83 an hour and worked an average of forty hours per…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Herron v. Jupiter Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Schmitz v. Campbell-Mithun, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Robinson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
- Schertz v. Waupaca CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1988
- Furillo v. Dana Corp. Parish DivisionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.