Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Harry
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 25, 1938No. 27496PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.
The question presented by this appeal is as follows: Was the partnership arrangement between Mrs. A. M. Harry and Harry Brothers bona fide, and were the notes and mortgages given by A. M. Harry to his wife and by W. M. Harry to the Bullock girls bona fide, and did the relationship of debtor and creditor exist between the respective parties?
The Bank Commissioner having obtained a judgment against A. M. Harry, and Nora A. Hertzler having obtained a judgment against A. M. Harry and W. M. Harry, executions were issued on said judgments, respectively, and levies were made under said1 executions on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Farmers' State Bank of Ada v. KeenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Martin v. CarlisleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- First National Bank of Ft. Smith v. DunklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Bailey v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Darnell v. State Nat. Bank of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hadwiger v. MelkusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. RichterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938