Legal Opinion · Dissent

Boucher v. Maine Employment Security Commission

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 8, 1983Published

1DissentWathen, Justice

I must respectfully dissent. The Court acknowledges that dissatisfaction with wages does not generally constitute “good cause” and yet undertakes the task of distinguishing those situations in which the employee has received a “substantial reduction” in wages. It is difficult to imagine a line that is more difficult to draw in the absence of any statutory guidance. The difficulties inherent in such a task are further compounded when, as in the present case, the comparison is made between total compensation, including incentive pay, and the basic wage rate paid after return to work.

It is my…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bilodeau v. Maine Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1957
  2. Richardson v. Maine Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  3. G. H. Bass & Co. v. Maine Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
  4. Ham v. Maine Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API