Richardson v. Maine Employment Security Commission
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
MARDEN, Justice.
On appeal. Appellant was employed by the United States Post Office Department, a Federal Agency, at Camden, Maine, from July 1, 1941 to March 31, 1965 at which time his employment was terminated by reason of a “mandatory retirement” provision of the Federal Civil Service Commission, which required retirement at the end of the month during which the employee attained the age of 70 years (5 U.S.C.A. § 2255 and Commission Regulation No. 723.-25). Appellant attained the age of 70 years on March 13, 1965.
Following his mandatory retirement, Appellant was ready, willing and able to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Warner Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Campbell Soup Co. v. BD. OF REVIEW, DIV. OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Krauss v. A. & M. KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Bergseth v. Zinsmaster Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Jackson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Board of Education of St. Louis v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission, Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Applegate v. Palladium Publishing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- G. H. Bass & Co. v. Maine Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
- McFadden v. Kentucky Unemployment Insurance CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
- Prospect Heights Fire Protection District v. Department of Employment SecurityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.