Legal Opinion

Guertin v. Dixon

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 15, 1993No. 2 CA-CV 92-0137PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FERNANDEZ, Judge.

Appellants, a group of lessees at Quail Ridge Estates mobile home park in Pima County, appeal from the trial court’s summary judgment ruling that the statute of limitations precludes their cause of action for a violation of the Arizona Mobile Home Parks Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, A.R.S. §§ 33-1401 through 33-1491. Appellees, the owners and/or managers of Quail Ridge, have cross-appealed from the court’s ruling that the subpart at issue applies to all tenants living in the park, past, present, and future.. We agree in part with the court’s conclusion on the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Amfac Distribution Corp. v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Kriz v. Buckeye Petroleum Co., Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Martin v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  5. O'Malley v. SimsArizona Supreme Court · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Third & Catalina Associates v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  2. Monroe v. Az AcreageCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  3. Third & Catalina Associates v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API