Legal Opinion

Long v. Doegg

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 18, 1937No. 7 Div. 378PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

Generally speaking, the finding of the judge of probate, on evidence ore tenus, is like the verdict of a jury and will not be disturbed upon a review of that tribunal, except for grounds which would warrant the setting aside of a verdict of a jury. Rogers v. McLeskey, 225 Ala. 148, 142 So. 526, and other cases cited by counsel for appellee. These cases, however, did not deal with cases like the one at bar, that is, involving the setting aside of the report of á duly appointed commission setting aside the exemptions to the widow and the fixation of the 'value of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rogers v. McLeskeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Foote v. FooteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cavin v. CavinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Campbell v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  3. Tolar v. ClemonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API