Legal Opinion

Everett George Fritzberg v. State of Florida, Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 17, 1969No. 27604_1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of this court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5th Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I.

This appeal is taken from the order of the district court denying habeas corpus relief to a Florida state convict. We find no error in the conclusions and application of the law made by the district court, and therefore affirm for the reasons so well expressed by Judge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Specht v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. Buchanan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  4. Ross v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  5. Baker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schroeder v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API