Legal Opinion

Fernyhough v. Rockwell

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal' from 'Circuit Court, Minnehaha • County. Hon. Joseph W. Jones, Judge. Action by J.' H. Ferny'hough against F: W. Rockwell, to quiet title. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. The only purpose of recording an instrument is that a purchaser may not be prejudiced’ by such’ failure.

Read the full summary

Appeal' from 'Circuit Court, Minnehaha • County. Hon. Joseph W. Jones, Judge. Action by J.' H. Ferny'hough against F: W. Rockwell, to quiet title. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. The only purpose of recording an instrument is that a purchaser may not be prejudiced’ by such’ failure. When Mr. Fernyhough purchased this- property he 'had full notice of the issuance of the tax certificate and the payment of all subsequent taxes by this defendant assignor, W. C. Hollister. These were matters of record in the auditor’s office. The issuance of the deed was a matter of record in the…

1Opinion of the CourtGates, J.

-Respondent purchased certain l’o-ts ..in the year 1907, obtaining a warranty deed therefor, .for value, (from the fee owner. Appellant is the' holder, of a tax deed of said lots, issued in 1897, upon a sale for the taxes of 1892, which deed was not recorded until 1911. At -the -time of 'his- purchase respondent bad no actual knowledge of the outstanding tax deed, nor of the sale upon which the deed was based. The tax receipts for several years -prior and subsequent thereto did, not indicate ■that there had been a sale of -the lots for taxes, nor did the -duplicate tax lists so indicate. Pol.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reeds v. MortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1846
  2. King v. LaneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Littlefield v. PrinceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1902
  4. Maddox v. ArthurSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Ives v. LynnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1829

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Union Central Life Insurance v. HoilienSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Lacombe v. HeadleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API