In Re Complaint of People's Cooperative Power Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
The Public Utilities Commission determined that People’s Cooperative Power Association, Inc. had received adequate notice and an opportunity to be heard in proceedings to determine interim electric service rights to a new facility in territory annexed by the City of Rochester. We reverse and remand for contested case proceedings.
FACTS
Relator People’s Cooperative Power Association, Inc. (People’s Cooperative) is a cooperative electric association regulated by the respondent Public Utilities Commission (Commission). Respondent City of Rochester (City) operates a municipal…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Costle v. Pacific Legal FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Jones v. Minnesota State Board of HealthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hennepin County Community Services Department v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- In re the Complaint by Kandiyohi Cooperative Electric Power Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Matter of Kandiyohi Co-Op. Elec. PowerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Hennepin County Community Services Department v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991