Dikeman v. Struck
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Kewaunee County. The facts are stated in the opinion. They cited Lowe v. Stringham, 14 Wis. 222; Orón v. Krones, 17 id. 401; 1 Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law, 183; Anderson v. Coburn, 27 Wis. 558; Williams
1Opinion of the CourtOetoN, J.
This is an action to foreclose a mortgage given by the defendants Walter Mrotek and Mary Mrotek to the plaintiff, to secure a note of $375 given by both, and the defendant John W. Struck was impleaded as having some interest in the mortgaged property subsequent to the mortgage. The defendants Walter and Mary Mrotek were duly served with summons; and the defendant Struck, not being found, was sought to be served by publication. Judgment was duly rendered foreclosing all of said defendants of their equity of redemption, the said Struck being a subsequent mortgagee. George B. Byron, Esq., an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anderson v. CoburnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Blackburn v. SweetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Lowe v. StringhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
- Alderson v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- Likens v. McCormickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by8 opinions
- Corbett v. Physicians' Casualty Ass'n of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- William Deering & Co. v. VenneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
- Bitter v. Gold Creek Mining Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Schwantz v. MorrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Zimmerman v. GerdesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.