Legal Opinion

Bitter v. Gold Creek Mining Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1937PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

It is undisputed that the service of the summons on the defendant was insufficient, but the plaintiff contends that, notwithstanding that insufficiency and the defendant’s special appearance on applying for the vacation of *57the service, the court acquired jurisdiction of the defendant because, in an order to show cause why service should not be vacated, a proposed adverse examination, under sec. 326.12, Stats., was enjoined until further order of the court. The affidavit, upon which the order to show cause was based, stated that it was made in support of a motion on a special appearance for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. SweetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Grantier v. RosecranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Gilbert-Arnold Land Co. v. O'HareWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Alderson v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Corbett v. Physicians' Casualty Ass'n of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Auchincloss, Parker & Redpath, Inc. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  2. Lees v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Mobley v. State ex rel. Com'rs of the Land OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. State ex rel. Northwestern Development Corp. v. GehrzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Stroup v. Career Academy of Dental Technology-Washington, D. C., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API