Legal Opinion

McLear v. Balmat

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

There are two motions in this action for consideration:(1) The defendant Northern Ore Company has made application for final judgment, for a confirmation of the sale in partition, for costs and an extra allowance. The defendants International Pulp Company and Union Talc Company have joined in this motion to the extent of asking for an additional allowance. That motion is opposed on various grounds by the defendants Sylvia Lake Co., Inc., Dominion Company of New York, Green Hill Mining Company, Inc., Dallas M. Hazelton and the plaintiff J. Hermon McLear. The defendants opposing the application…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sylvia Lake Co. v. Northern Ore Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. McLear v. BalmatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  3. McLear v. . BalmatNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. McLear v. . BalmatNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  5. McLear v. . BalmatNew York Court of Appeals · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walker Fertilizer Co. v. ColeSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  2. Walker Fertilizer Co. v. ColeSupreme Court of Florida · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API