Legal Opinion

McLear v. . Balmat

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Motion for re-argument.

The findings have been unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division so that we must take the facts as stated in the decision of the trial court. Twelve-thirteenths (12/13) interest of the property sought to be partitioned passed to the Northern Ore Company through the assignment and transfer of Pilling and Crane. By finding LXXI it is stated that the Northern Ore Company is ready and willing to pay the balance of the purchase price of $9,500 at any time when a deed of conveyance is prepared in proper form and ready to be executed, and that it is ready and willing to…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. McLear v. BalmatNew York Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API