Legal Opinion
R & P Capital Resources, Inc. v. California State Lottery
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 23, 1995No. C018032PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORRISON, J.
Prior to recent amendment, the State Lottery Act provided: “The right of any person to a prize shall not be assignable, except that payment of any prize may be paid . . . to a person designated pursuant to an appropriate judicial order. . . .” (Gov. Code, § 8880.32, subd. (g), as amended by Stats. 1992, ch. 500, § 3.) The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether that language permits the voluntary assignment of the right to lottery prize payments. In a declaratory action, the trial court held it did not. Plaintiff, R & P Capital Resources, Inc., the would-be assignee,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- DuBois v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- DeYoung v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Stafford v. Realty Bond Service Corp.California Supreme Court · 1952
- City of Lafayette v. East Bay Municipal Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lemieux v. Tri-State Lotto CommissionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Harustak v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Walker v. ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Walker v. RogersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Major v. SilnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.