State v. Drury
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
At the appropriate time the defendant’s counsel moved the court to direct a verdict of acquittal, and assigns the refusal as error. The testimony in the case, on the part of the state, tended to show the following: On June 30, 1926, an automobile, belonging to Chris Kremmel and occupied by two men, was parked on the side of a county road about five miles north of Eugene at 10 o’clock in the morning. The car remained there until about 2 o’clock in the afternoon, at which time two deputy sheriffs, in answer to a telephone call, went to the place and made an examination of the car. They found in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. CarmodyOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- State v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- State v. SawyerMontana Supreme Court · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. MurphyOregon Supreme Court · 1930
- State v. ORTIZ-RODRIGUEZCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009