Legal Opinion

A. Golie v. State

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 2017No. DA 16-0207PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 Andrew David Golie (Golie) appeals the denial of his petition for postconviction relief (PCR), which claimed ineffective assistance by his trial counsel. We affirm, and address the following issues:

1. Did counsel render ineffective assistance by not objecting to the mental-state jury instruction ?

2. Did counsel render ineffective assistance by not objecting to evidence regarding Golie’s “brothers” or “Modern Outlaw”?

3. Did counsel render ineffective assistance by revealing that Golie was on probation?

4. Did counsel render ineffective assistance by not objecting to the admission of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Whitlow v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. MatsonMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Adams v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. Paul RaczMontana Supreme Court · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. ColburnMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. HatfieldMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  3. A. Oliphant v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Walden v. Yellowstone ElectricMontana Supreme Court · 2021
  5. State v. S. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API