Legal Opinion
Brodsky v. Hercules, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 17, 1997No. Civil Action 96-51 MMSPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Gregory Isaac Brodsky (“Brod-sky”) brought this action against Hercules, Inc. (“Hercules”) as a result of his termination from employment in a Reduction in Force Program (“RIF”) implemented by Hercules in 1994. In Count I of his complaint, Brodsky alleges violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (the “ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq. In Count II, Brodsky claims Hercules has violated Delaware public policy as embodied in the DLAD. In Count III, he claims that Hercules breached an implied covenant of good…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Riley v. Delaware River and Bay AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2006
- Miller v. Safeway, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2007
- MacKenzie v. Miller Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- MacKenzie v. Miller Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Ulmer v. Home Depot, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2007